UIST 2026 Papers: Pre-Rebuttal Review Summary
There was a 33% increase in UIST paper submissions. The overall mean score is 2.46 and the median is 2.5. Papers with an overall score of 3.0 or higher are in the top 23% of submissions.
The UIST 2026 papers track received a record number of submissions this year: 1,259 complete submissions, a 33% increase from UIST 2025. 84 (6.7%) of these papers were rejected prior to full reviews as they were determined to meet "Desk Reject" criteria (27 papers) or "Assisted Desk Reject" criteria (57 papers) (see the CFP for the criteria).
In total, 1,175 papers received 4 reviews: two from committee members (ACs) and two from external reviewers. Each reviewer assigned the paper a score from 1.0 (lowest) to 5.0 (highest). The mean of these scores is called the "Overall Score". For the purpose of analysis, all papers that were Desk Rejects or Assisted Desk Rejects were assigned an Overall Score of 1.0.
The plot below shows the Overall Score across all complete submissions.
The mean of Overall Scores across all complete submissions is currently 2.46 (SD = 0.66) and the median is 2.5. If your paper has an Overall Score of 3.0 or higher, your paper is in the top 23.03% of complete submissions, close to the UIST 2025 acceptance rate of 22.22%. If your paper has an Overall Score of 3.5 or above, your paper is in the top 7.86% of submissions.
Authors should avoid interpreting these statistics as acceptance thresholds or acceptance probabilities, as the Overall Scores are not used directly to determine acceptance or rejection decisions. Instead, acceptance and rejection recommendations are made by Program Committee members considering the content of the submission and rebuttal (if provided), the content of the reviews, discussion among the reviewers, and discussion among Program Committee members at the PC meeting. The PC meeting this year will be held in person for the first time since 2019, in three different locations (Seoul, Ann Arbor, and Copenhagen).
Please see the review announcement email for guidance on deciding whether to prepare a rebuttal, and see the UIST 2026 author guide for more information on the review process.
We wish you the best in preparing your rebuttal and the next phase of the review process.